Post Tagged with: "GOP"

Rising Gas Prices Vs. American Drivers – How high do gas prices have to get to trigger behavior change?

March 15, 2012 at 7:16 pm

Image Courtesy: AAA via Grist.com

Found this interesting graphic on Grist in an article titled “How high do gas prices have to get to trigger behavior change? “.  So, do Americans really change their driving habits when the gas prices rise? According to the graph, the answer is an emphatic yes.  The article quotes AAA saying, ” A AAA survey conducted at the beginning of the month found 84 percent of respondents saying they have changed their driving habits or lifestyle in some way in response to recent gas-price increases, and 87 percent would change driving habits further if prices remain this high for long. The most common change adopted so far is combining trips and errands, which 60 percent of respondents say they’ve done. And 16 percent say they’ve purchased or leased a more fuel-efficient vehicle.” Read the entire article here.

Note:  If the gas prices continue to rise with the drum beats of war getting louder and louder by the day, we can expect to see many drivers ditching their cars and opt to taking transit to work and to other places.  I hope the transit agencies do everything in their power to demonstrate the conveniences of riding a bus/train and entice these flocking masses to continue using transit as a primary option for getting around.  Oh, the big question I have in mind – Are the American transit agencies equipped to handle this sudden spike in ridership? Many transit agencies are hobbled by poor funding patterns over the years and it will be hard to meet this new segment of ridership arrives to what is an already exploding demand.  Let’s see what happens.  (Oh, no matter what the scenario is, one can expect to see a decline in VMT numbers again).


 

Read more Comments Off

Petrol and Politics – How Rising Gas Prices Make For Silly Political Games

March 2, 2012 at 2:54 pm

(Source: Reddit.com)

The brilliance of this image lies in exposing the hypocracy surrounding the escalation in gas prices. Too bad such political ploys have become the norm at Capitol Hill.  Can we let the President focus on solving the nation’s problems and spare him these silly distractions?  Compelling enough for a web post.

Image Courtesy: via Reddit

Read more 1

This is why people hate politics? Anti-earmark politician wants to redefine earmarks to exclude transportation projects

November 16, 2010 at 4:24 pm

(Source: Huffingtonpost; The Washington Monthly)

Let me make this clear upfront that my intention is not to make a political statement with this post.  I’m simply trying to find a reason and logic (possibly seek help from others to find these elements in our society).  Today’s Huff post had this article

“…On Tuesday morning, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) told the Minneapolis Star Tribune that she wants to redefine exactly what an earmark is. Specifically, she said, transportation projects should not be placed under the umbrella. Advocating for transportation projects for ones district in my mind does not equate to an earmark,” said the Minnesota Republican. “I don’t believe that building roads and bridges and interchanges should be considered an earmark… There’s a big difference between funding a tea pot museum and a bridge over a vital waterway.” The Star-Tribune notes that Bachmann “did solicit some earmarks when she first came to Congress” but “has been outspoken in pushing House Republicans to continue an earmark moratorium enacted last year.” But transportation funds are vital for job creation. And it seems likely that the reality of having a major spigot cut off is a bit frightening to even the self-proclaimed fiscal conservatives on the Hill.

Isn’t that what the White House was trying to accomplish via the Stimulus package – revitalize our nation’s infrastructure with targeted spending? Why did they take so much flak and blame for out of control spending? If such selective exclusions are to be made for one sector (i.e., transportation), why not make it possible for other sectors (i.e., agriculture, education, etc.)?  Does this mean Ms. Bachmann would be supportive of building a High-speed rail network, which is  identified (and funded) by the White House as an important piece of the nation’s future growth strategy, if it is funded as an earmark?  Are Earmarks are bad, unless they’re going to Ms. Bachmann’s district? Cutting spending is good, except for the “legitimate projects that have to be done.”Are we missing something here?

Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta
Read more Comments Off

Chris Christie at the helm of NJ’s MOST unintelligent decision, EVER!

October 7, 2010 at 5:16 pm
Governor of New Jersey Chris Christie
Image via Wikipedia

This had to be one of the odd things that anyone has ever done in the state of New Jersey. Hope this is not what New Jersey residents asked for when they elected Chris Christie as their Governor. If they have not realized by now, this decision he made today to kill the $8.7B ARC Tunnel project will make them fully realize what they are dealing with. What the residents of NJ got now is a somewhat myopic politician who does not have a vision to lead the state in the face of adversity!

First, I advise you to read the extracted paragraphs below (from NY Times) to understand what is really going on before reading up any further. If you already know, what the context is, then read on.

Now that you are well-read into the issue, let’s start looking at the nuts and bolts of this madness. What bothers me is the fact that NJ is already suffocating with its ever growing congestion and this Governor decides to kill a project that would have ease the congestion (at least the cross-border traffic between NYC and NJ) quite a bit over the coming years. The state’s growing population is adding to the exploding traffic situation, which is already a nightmare for many to deal with. Many of its roads are already bursting at the seams and this decision is going to make it even worse.

The total annual cost of traffic congestion in New Jersey in lost time, operating cost, and fuel consumption is approximately $4.9 billion. The average annual cost of congestion for New Jersey is estimated at $880 per licensed driver. Mind you these numbers are from a study, done almost a decade ago, that was partially supported by a grant from the Foundation of the New Jersey Alliance for Action, and the National Center for Transportation and Industrial Productivity, a member center of the University Transportation Centers Program, at NJIT. You can be safe to assume that these above mentioned congestion-induced numbers might have ballooned over the years to a much higher level, given the amount of economic and population growth experienced over the past decade.

By spending on this ARC tunnel, it would have encouraged more people to take their trains to work in NYC rather than to drive. Imagine what it would be like 20 years from now. What happens at that time? Will Chris Christie be around to undo this decision? Nope. Probably not and by then the state would have slipped so far behind other states in economic competitiveness and lost its value as a livable community, it will look more like a sorry state than an attractive state. It will no longer be the state that appeals to people as a destination to move to, buy houses, live, educate and raise their children.

It took 20 years to plan and several million dollars to get to this point and now the stakeholders and the general public have to go home, with nothing to show for, only crying over spilled milk! It is going to make the stakeholders, such as the Port Authority of NY & NJ, to run for cover when New Jersey proposes another big project of this kind. Trust me, this is a pretty good move to lose any trust you had earned with your stakeholders.

Alright, aside from the monetary impact there are numerous other undesirable impacts that are going to sprout from this decision-making! The growing congestion is going to worsen the air quality in the entire region and possibly harm the health of the people living in the region. This is not only going to affect the bottomline but also the well being of the resident of the state and the entire tri-state region (NY, NY & CT). It will cost them more money to care for its resident’s health at some point than to pay for this tunnel.

Is this what it all boils down to – undoing the progress of a state/Nation in the face of financial challenges? Where is the political will to march forward in times of adverse challenges!

I thought I was the only one who is puzzled by this decision but there is plenty of good company and they pretty much everyone has their own reason to be be upset. Here is Paul Krugman taking issue with Christie.

Amplify’d from www.nytimes.com

Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey said on Thursday that he has decided to terminate the construction of a commuter train tunnel between northern New Jersey and Manhattan because of escalating estimates of the project’s cost.

The federal government and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey had pledged $3 billion each toward the tunnel, but Mr. Christie said New Jersey could not afford to pay the balance.

All told, about $600 million had been spent. Senator Frank R. Lautenberg, a Democrat from New Jersey who supported the project, said that about half of that money came from the federal government and would have to be repaid by New Jersey.

The move would scuttle a project that has been in the planning for two decades and was supposed to double the capacity on trains into New York City and alleviate congestion on the region’s roads.

Read more at www.nytimes.com
See this Amp at http://bit.ly/9veawW
Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta
Read more Comments Off

G.O.P. Résumé, Cabinet Post, Knack for Odd Jobs – NY times profiles “Professor of Cocktail Situations” USDOT Sec. Ray LaHood

May 5, 2009 at 1:06 pm

(Source: NY Times)

WASHINGTON — Ray LaHood, the secretary of transportation, is not one to toot his own horn over how much he knows about planes, trains and automobile bailouts. On the contrary.

“I don’t think they picked me because they thought I’d be that great a transportation person,” Mr. LaHood says with refreshing indifference as to how this admission might play if, say, he were ever to bungle a bridge collapse.

Yes, transportation is Mr. LaHood’s day job, a post that a few days ago required him to attend a groundbreaking ceremony for a highway in New Hampshire, speak to a group about the dangers of tailgating trucks and discuss “bird strikes” on CNN.

But one of the astonishing things about Mr. LaHood, 63, is how limited his transportation résumé is, how little excitement he exudes on the subject (other than abouthigh-speed rail) and how little he seems to care who knows it. So why exactly did President Obama pick this former seven-term Republican congressman from Illinois to oversee everything that moves?

Mr. LaHood posits a theory. “They picked me because of the bipartisan thing,” he explained, “and the Congressional thing, and the friendship thing.”

The “bipartisan thing” and the “Congressional thing” are self-evident: Mr. LaHood is a Republican with close ties to Capitol Hill. One White House insider described Mr. LaHood as “a master of odd jobs,” whose knowledge of Washington allows him to take on assignments as varied as lobbying lawmakers on the budget and helping political novices in the cabinet navigate Beltway social rituals (“cocktail situations,” as Energy Secretary Steven Chu calls them).

In the White House, Mr. Chu describes Mr. LaHood, a former junior high school social studies teacher, as a source of “fatherly advice” for Washington newcomers like himself.

One “cocktail situation” occurred recently at the annual Gridiron Club dinner. Mr. LaHood was seated at the head table near Mr. Chu, and between Arne Duncan andTimothy F. Geithner, the education and Treasury secretaries. The men asked Mr. LaHood if they could flee the dinner before the interminable speechifying ended. No, Mr. LaHood counseled.

“I said, ‘Look, you’re window dressing,’ ” Mr. LaHood said. “ ‘You’re more of a prop. But it’s part of what we have to do.’ ” Mr. Chu and Mr. Duncan heeded the advice; Mr. Geithner did not.

Read more Comments Off

GOP gas tax protest draws dozens

February 25, 2009 at 6:01 pm

(Source: Boston Globe)

rizer_GOP-demo1_met.jpg
(George Rizer/Globe Staff)

A few dozen activists clutching posters and red gasoline cans attended a Republican rally this morning on the steps of the State House to protest the governor’s plan to raise the gas tax by 19 cents.

The protesters urged drivers on Beacon Hill to honk to object to Governor Deval Patrick’s transportation bill, which would increase the gas tax instead of tolls on the Massachusetts Turnpike.

“Everybody who drives to work was honking their horn,” said Barney Keller, spokesman for the state Republican Party. “It went excellent. We had people braving the cold.”

Click here to read the entire article.

Read more Comments Off