WMATA is now ready to mash! Washington, DC’s Metro takes a giant leap by sharing transit data online for developers

March 24, 2009 at 7:13 pm

(Source: Faster Forward blog – Washington Post)

Upgrading Transit’s Interface: Metro Releases Google Transit Data

This morning, Metro’s Web site has a new page with a title not normally seen on the online presences of transit agencies: “Developer Resources.”

Photo Courtesy: Mymetrostop@Flickr

That page offers a download of Metro’s bus and rail schedules inGoogle Transit Feed Specification format, ready for any developer to download and reuse in a Web page or in a standalone program. (At the moment, clicking through the user agreement on the page only sends you back to the user agreement, but I’m sure somebody at Metro will correct that soon enough. Right?)

 In doing this, Metro is following the example of a lot of smart Web sites — but too few government agencies — by letting the rest of the world re-use, re-publish and mash up its data. The immediate effect of a GTFS download may only be the addition of Metro rail and bus routes to thetransit guidance offered on Google Maps (assuming the Mountain View, Calif., Web firm doesn’t object to Metro’s terms of use). That alone should make Metro’s services far more “discoverable,” to use a little human-interface jargon. But when anybody else can play this game, the possibilities are wide open.

In the same way that Web developers have used Google Maps tools to build crafty sites charting everything from real-estate sales to campaign donations, people will be able to build Web sites, widgets and programs using Metro’s data in ways that the company hasn’t thought of and may never dream up on its own.

For a sense of the possibilities, look over this interview from last year, in which two managers in Portland, Oregon’s Tri-Met transit agency explain how independent developers and other government agencies are building useful software and services off their data feeds with minimal cost and effort.

Click here to read the entire article. 

A TransportGooru exclusive from Dr. Roadmap: Christmas in April? President Obama doubles tax breaks for ridesharers

March 24, 2009 at 12:14 am

TransportGooru is proud to team up with David Rizzo, better known as Dr. Roadmap,  a Commute Management expert who writes about issues such as improving gas mileage (mpg), alternate routes, traffic congestion, ridesharing, commuting behavior and intelligent transportation systems on California’s Orange Country Register.  He is well known for his comprehensive guide ever written on off-freeway commuting in Southern California, published in 1990.  Two years later he became the first traffic reporter to offer daily alternate routes in real time over the air on one of the most popular morning radio shows in Los Angeles.  Starting today, he will be contributing bi-weekly columns exclusively for TransportGooru.   Here is his first column on tax breaks, just in time for the tax season as we sharpen our pencils and start crunching the numbers before the arrival of April 15:

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Perhaps October 31, Halloween, is the scariest day of the year, or even Friday the Thirteenth and its specter of 24 hours of bad luck? Maybe. But the one day most working Americans dread most is April 15, the deadline for filling our income tax returns. However, a silver lining surrounds this annual dark cloud for those who share the ride on their way to their job.

On February 17, President Obama single-handedly doubled the tax-free benefit for ridesharers with the signing of the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009. Now people who take a train, bus or a vanpool to work can receive up to $230 per month from their employer, TAX FREE. That works out to $2760 annually. Anyone treated to a W-2 form at the end of the year qualifies.

Photo Courtesy: Paul Keleher@Flickr

Previously, this amount was limited to just $120 per month, or $1440 per year, as outlined in the Internal Revenue Code, Section 9010.

This fringe benefit encourages commuters to abandon their cars in favor of transit and vanpools, which feature a lower carbon footprint per passenger mile.

Referred to as the Commuter Choice program, it even benefits employers who provide these transportation fringe benefit funds in addition to, or in lieu of, existing compensation paid to their workers. What this means for those of us who haven’t earned a CPA credential lately, is employers realize a savings of at least 7.65% on the amount set aside, since payroll taxes do not apply.

Of course, you know there has to be a “gotcha” or two, but they’re not too bad.

The main catch is that your employer must pay for your commuting expenses by way of a bus pass, rail pass or Transit Check — which is a universal voucher produced by Commuter Check Services Corporation that acts like a gift certificate to purchase transit passes. Most transit agencies honor these.

An employer can also pay money to a vanpool provider, be it a company-sponsored vanpool or otherwise, just as long as the van seats seven adults (including the driver), and at least 80 percent of the mileage is for transporting employees from home to work and back again.

However, an employee cannot receive any cash directly. Otherwise, the IRS will seek a piece of the action.

Additionally, these benefits do not accrue to commuters who carpool. A possible reason behind this exclusion includes the fact that a van, bus, or train can remove far more vehicles off the road than a normal passenger car. Additionally, keeping track of what qualifies as a bona fide carpooling arrangement for commuting purposes only, could prove contentious and time consuming for any employer.

For the first time, though, anyone who pedals to work gets a break. Called the Qualified Bicycle Commuting Reimbursement, a biker can receive up to $20 per month from his or her employer, tax free, for reasonable expenses which include the purchase of a bike, bike improvements, repairs or storage.

President Obama also raised the tax-free parking allowance to $230 per month. And, yes, an employee can take advantage of BOTH benefits. Such would be the case for an employee who drives to a transit station that lacks free parking, then hops on a train for the rest of the trip to work. The potential tax-free income here adds up to a significant $5,520 per year.

While each state clings to its own interpretation of how employers can reimburse their employees for ridesharing, at least the feds have taken some of the sting out of tax time.

We need no longer lie panic stricken when April 15 rolls around.

©2009, Dr. Roadmap®

————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Note: This is copyright-protected content.  Please contact Transportgooru if you like to use this article or portions of this article.  Thank you.

Transit Etiquette vs. NYC Etiquette – Pregnant and Standing on the Subway

March 23, 2009 at 7:02 pm

(Source:  Wall Street Journal Blog  – The Juggle)

I just had the fourth day in a row where I stood much of the way on my 40-minute subway ride. I’m 6.5 months pregnant–and it’s obvious–and not a single person offered me a seat. What’s more, sometimes I have had people literally push past me (I’m not as speedy as I used to be) to get the last seat on the train.

It’s not just me. Recently, a woman with a cast from foot-to-knee got on about 15 minutes into my ride. Nobody offered the casted woman a seat. So I did–it was a rare day that I’d snagged an empty seat. She refused because I am pregnant. I took the opportunity to shame my fellow passengers by saying, “It’s pretty bad when the pregnant lady is the only one offering someone with a cast a seat.” Nobody budged.

As a courtesy, I have always offered a seat to pregnant women, older people and anyone who was disabled, on crutches, or the like. It just seems like the human thing to do. (On some Japanese trains, a uniformed “manners squad” patrols cars to make sure that the elderly, disabled and pregnant have seats.)

Click here to read the entire blog. (Subscription Reqd.  Free Registration available). Also, if you have an extra minute, answer a quick poll @ Sodahead on this issue.

Paris Announces Ambitious New $25 Billion Rail System (“Greater Paris” Initiative)

March 20, 2009 at 1:21 pm

(Source: The Transport Politic); Photo Courtesy: The Infrastructurist)

New circular route around city core would improve suburb-to-suburb commuting


On March 17, Christian Blanc, France’s minister of Development in the Capital Regionannounced that the state would invest 15-20 billion Euros over the next 10 years for the construction of the world’s longest automated rapid transit line, at 130 km and with 60 stations. The minister made the announcement of the state’s commitment at a day-long presentation of proposals by architects for “Le Grand Paris,” an attempt to unite the city and the surrounding suburbs through governmental reforms and infrastructure improvements. The Paris’ city core is currently cut off from its suburbs by a ring road.

There’s been a lot of talk in recent months about the potential for a new transit line that would circle the city without entering it because of the growing number of suburb-to-suburb commutes, the continued development of the dynamic business center at La Défense on the west side of the city, the creation of science and technology cores in the south at Saclay and in the north at Le Bourget, and the continued need for improving the social equity between the poor northeastern sections of the suburbs and the wealthy western areas. RATP, the city’s mass transit authority, has proposed a project called Métrophérique, and the region of Ile-de-France has proposed the Arc Express; both projects would ring relatively closely to the city’s outer limits and hit the densest areas of the suburbs.

Click here to read the entire article and to check out the proposed route maps.

HUD and USDOT Announce Joint Sustainable Communities Initiative

March 20, 2009 at 12:18 pm

 (Source: The Transport Politic)

HUD and DOT will encourage communities to combine federally-mandated metropolitan area housing and transportation plans 

During the campaign, now-President Barack Obama argued that the federal government could contribute to the planning and development of neighborhoods around the country through a livable communities initiative, arguing that “Our communities will better serve all of their residents if we are able to leave our cars to walk, bicycle and access other transportation alternatives.” Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood and Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan testified today on the issue in front of the House Subcommittee on Transportation and Housing (part of the Appropriations Committee).

Both Secretaries argued that transportation and housing had to be planned together in order to handle the rising costs of both for most American households. Each pointed out that providing housing near public transportation allows for lower transportation costs and argued that transportation and housing in the United States should be organized in order to address climate change concerns.

HUD and DOT will establish a Sustainable Communities Initiative, which will encourage transit-oriented development. The initiative will encouraged integrated planning with HUD and DOT working together on neighborhood projects by encouraging metropolitan areas to consolidate their current government-mandated five-year housing plans and four-year transportation plans, both of which are used to determine federal formula appropriations to communities. The program will also consider transportation costs when determining the level of affordability in communities and develop “livability measures” to benchmark improvements that can be made to communities through federal funding. Finally, HUD and DOT programs and research will be “harmonized.”

Click here to read the entire article.  Click here to read a related article on tihs subject from the TransportGooru archives.

Brookings scholar articulates the connections between housing and transportation and the need for integrated planning

March 20, 2009 at 10:12 am

(Source: Brookings Institute)

Brookings Senior Fellow Robert Puentes tells a House Appropriations panel this week that “how and where we build in the future carries far-reaching implications for the health of our environment, our energy security, and our economic recovery and will continue to impact our metropolitan areas’ success and our ability to compete globally.”

Unfortunately, the U.S. track record here is not good.  Puentes’ research shows that between 1980 and 2000, the growth of the largest 99 metro areas in the continental U.S. consumed 16 million acres of rural land, or about one acre for every new household.5Indicative of this outward sprawl is the fact that more than 70 percent of the 100 largest metros’ recent population growth over the same period of time occurred outside of principal cities—the largest and most established cities within each metro in terms of population and employment.

Click here to read or download Mr. Puentes’ testimony to the House Appropriations panel.  Shown below is the read-only version of the PDF document.

House Budget Writers told $545 Billion Needed for Nation’s Transportation Programs

March 18, 2009 at 1:02 pm

The US Capitol Against a Pink and Purple Morning Sky (71/365)(Source:  AASHTO)

Enactment of the FY 2010 budget resolution “will be the starting point as the House considers the new surface transportation authorization bill,” Kansas Secretary of Transportation Deb Miller testified today before the House Budget Committee.

Appearing on behalf of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Miller outlined a six-year, multi-modal transportation investment that includes:

  • $375 billion for highways;
  • $93 billion for transit;
  • $42 billion for freight, from outside the Highway Trust Fund; and
  • $35 billion for intercity passenger rail, also from outside the Highway Trust Fund.

Miller noted that even before addressing authorization, however, the Congress must ensure that the Highway Trust Fund has sufficient revenue to fund the current program. An $8 billion transfer made by Congress last September may not be sufficient to last through the year, she said.   

Miller’s complete testimony may be accessed at tinyurl.com/miller-2009-03-17. For information on AASHTO’s authorization recommendations go to www.transportation.org.

Click here to read the entire article.

French firm Egis win $30 million technical consultancy contract for the $3billion Chennai metro project

March 12, 2009 at 7:21 pm

(Source:  India Times)

Commuter train

CHENNAI, India:  Chennai metro railway, within a month of obtaining cabinet clearance and awarding contracts for the first phase of construction, touched yet another milestone this week, by employing a European technical consultant for design and supervision of the project. 

Chennai metro rail corporation (CMRL) has awarded the USD 30 million technical consultancy contract to a consortium of five companies named Egis Rail India, led by French transport infrastructure projects company Egis Projects. US-based NYSE listed engineering and architectural design giant Aecom Technology Corporation is part of the consortium. 
While the names of other firms involved in the consortium are not known, an official source confirmed the awarding of the contract to Egis. “The technical consultant will conduct engineering feasibility studies, prepare designs and oversee their execution,” the source said. CMRL, the management consultant, will continue to be the entity tendering construction contracts.

Egis projects, which has been involved in a number of road and rail based projects in Europe, including high speed, light and underground rail lines in France, earns 9% of its revenues from Asia. Its Indian subsidiary Egis India has floated the consortium Egis Rail India, which was one of the two entities, short-listed from six, for the final race to the Chennai metro rail consultancy contract. 

Click here to read the entire article.

Freakonomics Special: Los Angeles Transportation Facts and Fiction – Driving and Delay

March 12, 2009 at 6:43 pm

(Source: Freakonomics,New York Times via Planetizen; Photo Courtesy: respres@Flickr)

 TransportGooru recommends reading Eric Morris’s  six-part series that discusses stereotypes about Los Angeles transportation.   So, start with the Introduction first and read up the rest.

——————————————————————————————————————————————

Here is the article on Driving and Delay:

Time to bring the quiz to a close. We’ve seen in past posts that, by the standards of U.S. cities, Los Angeles is not sprawling, has a fairly extensive transit system, and is decidedly light on freeways. The smog situation has vastly improved. The final two stereotypes await.

Thanks to the great distances between far-flung destinations, and perhaps Angelenos’ famed “love affair” with the car, Angelenos drive considerably more miles than most Americans. 

Answer: False.

 According to the Federal Highway Administration, Angelenos drive 23 miles per resident per day. This ranks the Los Angeles metro area 21st highest among the largest 37 cities. The champions (or losers) are probably Houston, followed by Jacksonville and Orlando, all of which are over 30 miles per day. New Yorkers drive the fewest miles (17 VMT per resident per day), thanks in large part to relatively high transit ridership and lots of walking trips.

Despite our reputation, we Angelenos don’t exhibit any particularly great predilection for freeway travel either. Los Angeles ranks 14th out of the 37 largest metro areas in terms of highway miles driven per resident per day. To be sure, this is above the median, but it hardly points to the sort of unique freeway fetish Angelenos are accused of harboring.

Click here to read th entire article.  

Put in Perspective: Amount of Space Required to Transport People by Car, Bus, or Bicycle

March 12, 2009 at 5:04 pm

This image below has been going around the internet for quite a while and is quite popular in teh urban planning circles.  Treehugger had a post today and I captured it for you all.  Here is that striking picture from Muenster, Germany.   I am sure you will think twice before you start the car tomorrow..

————————————————————————————————

(Source: TreeHugger)

amount of space required cars bus bicycles poster image

Image: Press-Office City of Müenster, Germany

And That’s Just Space…
They say an image is worth a thousand words. In this case, it really is. You can write about urban planning and air pollution and traffic congestion, but the three photos above show you at a glance the difference between these three means of transportation. And space isn’t everything: Cars also cost more money, pollute more, increase risks of obesity and all kinds of diseases, etc.

Click here to read more.